Gundam Eclipse
Cluster of bright red ripe tomatoes on the vine against a blurred green background

A community for builders of all skill levels — share finished builds, works in progress, kit reviews, and stay up to date with forum announcements.

Browse the Display Case

Stay Connected

Get the latest from the Gundam Eclipse community delivered to your inbox.

Latest from the Forum

Gundam Eclipse is Moving!

September 26, 2018 — by tc012009

An important announcement was posted in GE Forum News regarding the future of the community. The forum had accumulated 240 topics and approximately 1,900 posts in its announcements section by this time.

  • Posted in GE Forum News
  • Final recorded announcement in the section

Moderoid 1/60 SAVAGE CROSSBOW

HG Revive RX-78-2 vs the original 1999 HG

The RX-78-2 is one of the most revisited designs in Gunpla, and the contrast between the 2015 HGUC Revive and the original 1999 HGUC release is especially revealing. Both represent the same mobile suit, yet they reflect very different ideas about what a 1/144 high-grade kit should provide.

The older model has nostalgic value and a solid, uncomplicated build. The Revive version brings sharper proportions, dramatically improved articulation, and a more display-friendly silhouette. For builders deciding which interpretation belongs in their collection, the differences extend well beyond age.

This comparison focuses on the original HGUC RX-78-2, commonly associated with kit number 021, rather than later entry-grade or limited-edition versions. Build experience, visual character, accessories, and customization potential all play a part in choosing between them.

Shape and visual character

The 1999 kit has a sturdy, slightly squat appearance that feels close to the angular artwork of its era. Its torso is broad, the limbs are relatively simple, and the details are restrained. Some builders may find this look charming because it resembles classic box-art interpretations rather than the slimmer proportions favored by modern releases.

The HGUC Revive RX-78-2 is noticeably leaner and more athletic. Its narrow waist, longer legs, sharper armor separation, and more dynamic stance make it look closer to contemporary animation styling. The proportions are clean without becoming excessively stylized, though fans who prefer the chunky original may consider the Revive design less distinctive.

Articulation and poseability

Movement is the Revive’s clearest advantage. The newer kit includes double-jointed knees and elbows, a mobile waist, improved shoulder construction, and more flexible ankles. These features allow crouching poses, two-handed weapon grips, and convincing action stances without requiring extensive modification.

The 1999 HG has functional articulation for its time, but its range is limited by simpler joints and bulkier construction. The knees and elbows offer basic bends, while the shoulders and waist restrict more expressive posing. It works well in a straightforward standing display, but recreating dramatic Gundam battle scenes takes patience and occasional support from an action base.

Assembly and surface detail

The original is a quick, approachable build with fewer parts and less internal complexity. That simplicity can be useful for beginners, painters, or builders who want a fast project. It also leaves broad armor surfaces that are easy to customize with panel lines, pla-plate, or weathering.

The Revive requires a little more attention because its layered armor and articulated frame create additional fitting points. Color separation is substantially better, reducing the need for stickers or immediate painting. Some seam lines remain, particularly around the weapons and limbs, but the overall finish is much more refined. Builders working toward a clean display piece will appreciate the modern engineering.

Equipment and build experience

Both kits provide the essential RX-78-2 loadout: beam rifle, shield, beam saber equipment, and a bazooka. The Revive’s weapons generally look more proportionate with its slimmer body, and its shield can be positioned in more natural defensive poses. Its hands and weapon grips also make recreating familiar scenes less frustrating.

The older equipment has a simpler, more traditional appearance. It may lack the crispness of the newer plastic, but that can suit a heavily weathered or retro-styled build. For builders comparing several releases, the Gundam reviews archive offers a useful place to consider how this kit fits into the wider HG lineup.

Feature Original HGUC RX-78-2 (1999) HGUC RX-78-2 Revive
Overall proportions Broad and compact Slimmer and more dynamic
Articulation Basic for its period Excellent for a modern HG
Color separation Limited Stronger, with fewer stickers
Surface detail Simple, open armor panels Sharper, layered detailing
Weapons Classic core loadout Similar loadout with improved posing
Best suited to Retro builds and customization Action poses and clean displays
Typical weakness Limited mobility and dated joints Occasional seam lines and lighter proportions

Which kit builds better?

For an uncomplicated weekend project, the 1999 version remains appealing. Its lower part count makes assembly easy to follow, and its broad surfaces provide a forgiving foundation for painting. It is also an interesting snapshot of late-1990s Gunpla engineering, making it valuable to collectors who enjoy the history of the hobby.

The Revive is the stronger all-purpose recommendation for most builders. It assembles with modern expectations in mind, stands securely, and rewards experimentation with poses. Its construction is still accessible to a first-time builder, while experienced hobbyists can use it as a base for upgrades, battle damage, or a custom color scheme.

Nub cleanup and finishing choices

On the original HG, visible seams and less precise part separation can become prominent after assembly. Careful trimming, cementing, and cleanup help, especially on the weapons and larger armor sections. Its simpler design makes it easy to practice these techniques without risking an expensive or highly detailed kit.

The Revive benefits from equally careful finishing because its sharper geometry makes small flaws easier to notice. Clean nub removal is particularly important around the white armor and joint parts; this nub mark guide explains an alternative approach for builders who want to preserve crisp edges while minimizing sanding.

Choosing the right RX-78-2

The best choice depends on the kind of project you want on the workbench. Use these priorities as a quick guide:

  • Choose the 1999 HGUC if you enjoy retro proportions and straightforward assembly.
  • Choose the Revive if articulation and expressive posing matter most.
  • Pick the older kit for a weathered, customized, or historically themed build.
  • Pick the Revive for a clean shelf display with minimal modification.
  • Consider owning both to show how HG engineering changed across sixteen years.

The older model is not simply an obsolete version, and the Revive is not automatically the better artistic interpretation. One offers character through simplicity and age; the other offers flexibility through modern engineering. Displayed together, they make an excellent study in changing proportions, part separation, and builder expectations.

Share your RX-78-2 build, compare your favorite version, and join the discussion with fellow modelers on Gundam Eclipse.

A member-contributed review of the Moderoid 1/60 SAVAGE CROSSBOW kit, published in the Gundam Eclipse Reviews section. The reviews area hosted 246 topics and roughly 1,400 posts.

PG 00 Gundam

November 4, 2018 — by heathorn

A completed Perfect Grade 00 Gundam build showcased in The Display Case. This section featured approximately 2,200 topics and 24,900 posts, making it one of the forum's largest galleries of finished work.

HG Zeta Gundam Evolution Project

2018 — by kajnrig

An ongoing High Grade Zeta Gundam customization project shared in the Work-in-Progress Thread. This was the most active section on the forum, with roughly 1,400 topics and 34,300 posts where members exchanged feedback and progress updates.